Estate preparation i...
Other Services
The detailed and comprehensive Invalidity search report enables clients for highly sensitive litigation, opposition, and patent acquisition cases where a high-definition claim chart is required to ease the attorney’s efforts. Before going for any invalidity search, we analyze the subject patent case in-depth using litigation/ opposition documents (if any), file wrapper, etc., to build a sound understanding of the case. We categorize the identified references into three categories “X”, “Y”, and “A”, as per the international search report (ISR).
- “X” Category: Novelty or Inventiveness in one reference.
- “Y” Category: If novelty or inventiveness is lacking in one document; two or more references are identified to generate a claim chart.
- “A” category: This category references background art that neither discloses any novelty nor inventiveness.
IeB’s Invalidity search report is enabled with a feature matrix generated for each feature. This enables attorneys to have a quick walk-through of fully supported, partially supported, inferentially supported, and non-supported features. Below are the strategies applied for an exhaustive Invalidity search.
Why is Patent Invalidation Study Imperative?
· To invalidate the claims of a patent through a prior art search.
· To check the potency of a granted patent.
· To assess the validity of an established patent.
Why Ingenious for Invalidation Search?
· We employ robust analytical tools to perform an exhaustive patent search.
· We have access to paid non-patent databases, such as IEEE, Scopus, web of science, etc.
· We include all the relevant references that target innovation and non-obviousness.
· Class translation to Japanese and Korean.
· We offer multiple native language search options for our global clients.
· Standard search on 3GPP & IEEE portal.
· We provide both novelty and inventiveness-based search strategies to kill an art.
· We offer flexible pricing options to meet client budgets without compromising quality results.
· We follow KSR seven rationales to determine the obviousness.
· Proven records with fortune 500 companies with success stories.
· High-definition color-coded claim charts to reduce attorney efforts in review.
Comments