Elite Youth Basketba...
Other Services
The detailed and comprehensive Invalidity search report enables clients for highly sensitive litigation, opposition, and patent acquisition cases where a high-definition claim chart is required to ease the attorney’s efforts. Before going for any invalidity search, we analyze the subject patent case in-depth using litigation/ opposition documents (if any), file wrapper, etc., to build a sound understanding of the case. We categorize the identified references into three categories “X”, “Y”, and “A”, as per the international search report (ISR). “X” Category: Novelty or Inventiveness in one reference. “Y” Category: If novelty or inventiveness is lacking in one document; two or more references are identified to generate a claim chart. “A” category: This category references background art that neither discloses any novelty nor inventiveness. IeB’s Invalidity search report is enabled with a feature matrix generated for each feature. This enables attorneys to have a quick walk-through of fully supported, partially supported, inferentially supported, and non-supported features. Below are the strategies applied for an exhaustive Invalidity search. Why is Patent Invalidation Study Imperative? · To invalidate the claims of a patent through a prior art search. · To check the potency of a granted patent. · To assess the validity of an established patent. Why Ingenious for Invalidation Search? · We employ robust analytical tools to perform an exhaustive patent search. · We have access to paid non-patent databases, such as IEEE, Scopus, web of science, etc. · We include all the relevant references that target innovation and non-obviousness. · Class translation to Japanese and Korean. · We offer multiple native language search options for our global clients. · Standard search on 3GPP & IEEE portal. · We provide both novelty and inventiveness-based search strategies to kill an art. · We offer flexible pricing options to meet client budgets without compromising quality results. · We follow KSR seven rationales to determine the obviousness. · Proven records with fortune 500 companies with success stories. · High-definition color-coded claim charts to reduce attorney efforts in review.
Comments