https://community.sm...
Casting - Auditions
I'm in a unique position. I spent 8 seasons in"the" Madden NFL 23. three under the "old" CBA and cheap MUT 23 ltds my last five under the current CBA, which is set to expire following the 2020 season. I've observed firsthand the shifts in the training camp schedule (no anymore two-a day days and more days off) as well as the offseason program (fewer days and hours at facilities). It's much easier on the body, there's no doubt.
However, if you listen carefully it's not helped but it's not lowered the Madden NFL 23 injury rate. In fact, most on the medical side would concur that less practice time has resulted in more injury-related injuries in game because players' bodies aren't capable of handling the physical strain of playing on Sundays.
Madden NFL 23 owners know they can persuade some players by promising less practice time for more games, but the majority of retired players, which includes myself, would've preferred the extra money for an increase in practice hours.
While the goal of the Madden NFL 23 owners is to attract players with less of everything prior to the regular seasonbegins, I believe that this is not one of the main reasons Madden NFL 23 players decide on 17 games.
More money and better health benefits are the things that players must fight for
Players consider themselves equal in this deal , and advancing to 17 games increases the chance of injury and a shortened career. They are looking for more than the owners are offering- 48.5 per cent of revenue -the amount needed to bring it about. I do believe that an increase of 49 percent could convince them to settle for 17 games, and 50 percent could bring about a deal.
The only question mark is what else can be expected from the proposed 17-game schedule? Are the increased retirement benefits , minimum salaries and retirement benefits linked to the 17-game idea? Do they disappear if players don't want to play 17 games? If yes, would better pay for younger players and MUT 23 ltds for sale more benefits to old players overpay for the privilege of not earning up to 49 or 50 percent of the revenue split?
Some players might agree that it's true. Taking care of the entire group is the goal of the union. And if sacrificing a percent or two would give the primary players more money in their pockets they'd probably be happy.
Comments